Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Engineers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Future Engineers

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Future Engineers
• Articles for deletion/Future Engineers (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Future Engineers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article has mutiple issues withit, as shown on the article mainpage.Theprussian (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:Music, absolutely no references from reliable sources --Cactus.man ✍ 13:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination and above. This article was started in 2005 yet has zero references. If the group met WP:BAND a search for "Future Engineers +music" would have turned up multiple reports of their recordings and industry awards. Not notable. Blue Riband► 16:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of anything like sufficient notability to justify having an article. On top of this the article is mainly just an A-Z of releases (with nothing to suggest any of them are notable) with very little of what could be called encyclopedic content and as noted above no reliable sources are provided. Dunarc (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.