Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphabet Business Concern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cardiacs. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Alphabet Business Concern

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Alphabet Business Concern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is built on non-independent/unreliable sources. I have conducted a search which found remarkably little on this label; it seems clear to me that it isn't indecently notable of the band Cardiacs and doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NORG. A redirect to Cardiacs might be in order. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

• Redirect references all point to Cardiacs so redirect there. References are not good with regard to GNG and NCORP.--Whiteguru (talk) 21:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect per Whiteguru. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
• Keep article now has secondary sources. Miklogfeather (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC) — Miklogfeather (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep per Miklogfeather. IAmAnIndividual (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Comment: the sources that have been added confirm my previous impression: they do not contain significant coverage of the subject. Indeed, some are from blatantly unreliable sources such as the deprecated Rate Your Music. Redirecting continues to be a reasonable option. Modussiccandi (talk) 13:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cardiacs. Even with added sources still lacks the significant coverage required by WP:NCORP. Not independently notable. --Bejnar (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cardiacs. These references are about the CARDIACS - not about the record label. There's very little RS here focussing on the record label of itself. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cardiacs as WP:ATD, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability of this organization as per NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cardiacs.4meter4 (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.